Sunday, March 3, 2019
Burning a Nation’s Flag: Hate Crime
Burning a nations signal flagst wholeness detest Crime or Free Speech? A nations flag is one and only(a) of the most important things to a country. Citizens of a nation use it during spare ceremonies, and a nations flag is displayed all over that nation. A flag is an type shown as a symbol of unity. It symbolizes the pride and history of a nation. So what does desirous a nations flag call back? Is it considered a abominate criminal offense and illegal, or is it considered an proceeding of free rescue and saved by the firstly Amendment?For the purposes of this argument, a hate execration is defined as a crime motivated by racial, sexual, or other prejudice, typically one involving military group (What Are Hate Crimes? ). I believe that fire a nations flag is not a hate crime due to the fact that vehement a nations flag falls under a category that is protected by the First Amendment. In a hate crime, the targeted group could be categorized by not just race or sexuality, exclusively religion and political beliefs or group as well. By burning a nations flag, we could easily categorize it as targeting a political group.When a person burns a nations flag, he/she could be targeting the general flock of that nation, the government of that nation, or to be even more specific, the leaders of that government. . In this case, we will say that the political group referred to is the government(to be more specific, the American government). Therefore, by burning a nations flag, someone disagrees and takes a wear against a political activity or decision. In contrast to what a hate crime is, an act of free speech, protected by the First Amendment, is the rightfield to express any opinions without censorship or restraint.An act of free speech does not necessarily mean saying something out loud. It could also mean expressing your opinions about something by using actions. Since burning a nations flag suggests fetching a stand against a political activity, it is a way of expressing your opinion. sympathetic to free speech, freedom of expression which is part of the Human Rights Act says that you feature the right to hold your own opinions and to express them freely without government preventative (Equality and Human Rights Commission).The government cannot arrest you or punish you for burning a nations flag as long as no one gets physically hurt. Just like in almost every country most the world, America has its own Flag Code. The Flag Code is a fill for all handling and display of the Stars and Stripes, but it does not impose penalties for violate of the joined States flag (US code 36). Each state has its own flag law, and penalty for misuse of the flag is up to the state. Criminal penalties for certain acts of hooliganism of a flag were stated in Title 18 of the United States Code prior to 1989.The Supreme Court decision in Texas v. Johnson held the rule unconstitutional, though. In Texas v. Johnson, respondent Gregory Lee Joey Johnson was convicted of an act of disrespect of a venerated object, which violates a Texas statute. During the 1984 Republican National Convention, Johnson protested the policies of the Reagan administration and Dallas-based corporation. During the protest, Johnson burned the American flag. No one was physically hurt or injured, but some witnesses felt in earnest offended by this.However, due to the First Amendment, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals headstrong that the State could not punish Johnson for burning the flag in these circumstances. In addition, the Texas statute states that it is only illegal to burn a nations flag when the act would result in a serious disturbance of peace. However, the flag burning in this case did not threaten such a reply (Texas v. Johnson. ). It is true that showing your anger towards the government can be verbalized in other ways besides burning the nations flag.One could protest, write a book, or write a blog to take a stand against a polit ical action. However, no matter which of these actions you decide to do, you are facilitate doing it to achieve the same goal express your opinion and make a change in the government. Citation Page Texas v. Johnson. Cornell University Law School. 21 Mar. 1989. Online. 12 Feb. 2013. http//www. law. cornell. edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0491_0397_ZS. html. What Are Hate Crimes? SikhNet. Online. 12 Feb. 2013. http//fateh. sikhnet. com/s/HateCrimeInfo. member 485New York Laws. Online. 12 Feb. 2013.