Is Macbeth A Thoroughly Representative Character? :: essays research papers

Is Macbeth a Thoroughly Representative Character? several(prenominal) critics may contend that Macbeth is not a thoroughly representativecharacter, except through a close observation and understanding of the drama, itcan be seen that any rational human being, given the identical built in bed, wouldhave undergone the strike thought process and taken equal actions as did Macbeth.Macbeth was presented with a situation where he was forced to make an extremedecision. His driving ambition to accommodate King of Scotland corrupted him andcaused him to murder not only the king, but both those who had any ties to him.People may learn that Macbeth was insane for doing this, yet others depart agreethat the common character would have done the same.Given the situation, the type individual would have undergone the samealteration as did Macbeth. Presented with an equal stop an opportunity, onewould have become very eager and anxious, thus carrying discover the same criminalactions that Macbeth himself conveyed. A person, al focusings eager to gain endowment,would come out at the chance to acquire that power as soon as possible, no matterwhat they had to do. This is the situation Macbeth was in. He was seeking thethrone, and only cute to find a faster way to obtain that authority, thus hekilled, lied, and cheated his way to that place of honor.Readers may debate that Macbeth was indeed insane, thus take thereader to believe that he was not representative of a typic human. This istrue, yet any human can be insane, which further proves the rigour thatMacbeth was a common individual. Perhaps driven to insanity, no evidence existsto say that Macbeth was not ordinary, which means that he was not in any way polar from the rest of humanity. What he did in the drama was no differentthan what anyone would have done given the position Macbeth was in. Conceivablyan individual may not have murdered and become so very evil, besides one would