Wednesday, March 20, 2019
Frivolous lawsuits Essay example -- Legal Issues
Do you remember the lawsuit about the muliebrityhood who ordered the McDonalds coffee and spilled it in her lap and swear outd McDonalds because it did non baffle a warning label on it? What about the woman who fell in the fountain at the mall while texting and wants to sue the mall? These lawsuits may seem fairly farfetched. They fall into the category called frivolous. black-markets Law Dictionary defines frivolous as lacking a legal basis or legal merit non unplayful not reasonably purposeful (Garner, 2006). When people pursue such lawsuits as these it costs money. The civil justice system is plagued by high effect costs, meaning that it is both expensive and time consuming to use the courts to recess disputes (Ruschmann, 2006, p. 60). Frivolous lawsuits should not be sendn seriously. People should not be awarded money for things that they caused themselves, and they should not cost courts and consumers time and/or money. at that place are many steps to go through once you specify to file a lawsuit. Many Americans suffer from injuries but only a small percentage of them file a lawsuit because many of them have valid claims but they have little money. Sometimes when plaintiffs, the person register the lawsuit, go to trial there is a lot of money that has to be spent up-front. Taking a large case on a contingency fee and advancing all the out-of-pocket cost is a very expensive proposition (Bourhis, 2005, p. 76). Lawyers have created the contingent-fee arrangement. This is where a lawyer agrees to take a case without any money up front and without requiring the client to pay an hourly or flat fee. In return, the lawyer is entitle to receive a percentage of the actual amount of money collected, mostly 33 percent, but sometimes 40 percent if ... ...ceived potential for a large payout. Three percent of product obligation trials involved cyanogenic substances, including tobacco. Three tobacco product liability trials were disposed of a matter sam ple in 2005. All three of these trials were decided by juries that govern in favor of the defendants. Toxic substances were linked as 346 of the 354 product liability trials (Cohen, 2009). Tort reformers believe that courts must reduce the ability of defendants liability in order to avoid economic decline. In the years to come, the proposals likely to revert the biggest dispute include malpractice and class-action reform, limits on noneconomic and punitive damages, and a legislative antecedent to asbestos legation (Rushmann, 2006). There are many lawsuits. But the frivolous lawsuits should not be taken seriously and not cost our courts and citizens time and/or money.